This form resets the current branch head to and possibly updates the index See the “Interactive Mode” section of git-add(1) to learn how This means that git reset -p is the opposite of git add -p, i.e. The chosen hunks are applied in reverse to the index. Interactively select hunks in the difference between the index and Alternatively, using git- checkout(1) and specifying a commit, you can copy the contents of a path out of aĬommit to the index and to the working tree in one go. To check the contents out of the index to the working tree. Īfter running git reset to update the index entry, you can use git-checkout(1) This means that git reset is the opposite of git add. (Itĭoes not affect the working tree or the current branch.) This form resets the index entries for all to their state at. In the thirdįorm, set the current branch head (HEAD) to, optionally modifying index and In the first and second form, copy entries from to the index. I use a convenient alias ( git go) for viewing history as in step 2, which can be added like so: git config -global alias.Git-reset - Reset current HEAD to the specified state If your remote is hosted on a service without shell access, it probably has settings you can change to allow forced pushes. This may be worked around by temporarily changing one or both of nyNonFastForwards and nyDeletes. If the forced push fails, it's likely disabled by the remote. Git push -force staging v2.4.0b2:releases Copy the commit's hash, tag, or (if it's the tip) its branch name.Use git log -p to see changes, or git log -graph -all -oneline -decorate to see a compact tree. Use git log to find the commit you want to the remote to be at. You must have the desired commit somewhere in your local repo that you want the remote to match. This method can still wreck your remote if you choose the wrong commit to go back to, but even then you can usually find the right commit and try again. Local changes are not inherently required to change a remote. Using some other answers can result in unnecessary loss of local state. There is a checkbox named Allow rewriting branch history which you have to check. In BitBucket for example it said "Rewriting branch history is not allowed". Then you have to allow branch history rewriting for the specific branch. If you get a message like " ! a60f7d85 -> master (pre-receive hook declined)" (As always with git reset -hard, make sure that git status is clean, that you're on the right branch and that you're aware of git reflog as a tool to recover apparently lost commits.) You should also check that ORIG_HEAD points to the right commit, with git show ORIG_HEAD. Since from your question it's clear that you have already used git reset -hard to reset your master branch, you may need to start by using git reset -hard ORIG_HEAD to move your branch back to where it was before. Which one is most convenient depends on how many commits you want to revert, and which method makes most sense to you. There's a nice explanation of your options for doing this in this answer from Jakub Narębski. Update: you've explained below that other people have pulled the changes that you've pushed, so it's better to create a new commit that reverts all of those changes. In that case, it would be better to revert the commits that you don't want, then push as normal. However, you should avoid doing this if anyone else is working with your remote repository and has pulled your changes. Assuming that your branch is called master both here and remotely, and that your remote is called origin you could do: git reset -hard
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |